Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2021 ; 221 LNNS:329-336, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1340348

ABSTRACT

In Brazil, covid-19 reached 5 million infected people, with more than 200 thousand deaths. It is the 3rd country in the global contamination ranking, behind only the USA and India. Studies have shown that the covid-19 pandemic lethally reached the poorest in the world, those who could not stop working during the social isolation. In Brazil, Valente (2020) published that 20% poorest had twice the chance to be infected than the 20% of the wealthiest people. The study relates living conditions in popular homes during the pandemic and focuses on working-from-home and occupants’ new needs from an ergonomics perspective. This research evaluated the ergonomic conditions in a social house dwelling in Brazil. Its users are a young couple and one child, who remained in social isolation for 03 months - from March to June 2020. The analysis included the environmental conditions as comfort, accessibility, habitability, functionality, privacy, and ergonomics. Results highlighted the provisional workstations inside minimal housing and the problems of sharing these workstations between the different users’ profiles. Interior dimensions and furniture were not prepared to accommodate working activities for such a long time and simultaneously for the whole family. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

2.
Annals of Oncology ; 31:S1018, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-804608

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed health care delivery in the world, forcing clinicians to make challenging triage decisions. COVID-19 represents a significant harm for cancer patients, who are at high risk of infections due to their immunosuppressed status and serious COVID-19-related events. Portuguese oncologists joined forces to ensure safety of clinical practice without compromising cancer patients care, as the benefit of ensuring an anti-cancer treatment outweighs the risks of COVID-19. Methods: Description and outcomes analysis of structural organization measures adopted by a Portuguese Medical Oncology Department during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: A proactive approach to the actual emergency panorama was promptly implemented: use of individual protection equipment, triage of patients accessing the hospital, use of telemedicine in selected patients with no need for on-site assessment, customising treatment delivery, regularly test patients under immunosuppressive treatments, test all patients prior to admission in oncology wards, limited access for visitors and caregivers, health professionals worked in “mirror teams” and most multidisciplinary boards have been converted in telematic meetings. Despite all the constraints in the activity, the number of consultations (including tele-consultations) increased compared to the same period of the previous year (3245 consultations from 1/03 to 15/05/2020 versus 3305 in the same period of 2019), the number of first consultations remained similar comparatively (15%) and were carried out in a timely manner, indicative that the cancer patient circuit was not compromised. 368 fewer treatments were performed in the same period, compared to 2019. Until May 15th, 288 tests have been carried out. Four patients were positive for COVID-19 without severity criteria, two of them with a diagnosis of cure, currently being under antineoplastic treatment without related complications. Conclusions: Practice recommendations from European and national oncology societies were applied, which translated into a safe continuum of cancer care delivery. In the middle-term, will be a priority to assess the real impact on cancer mortality. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL